SOLDES
Jusqu'à -70% sur une sélection d'articles*
The Case of History Vs Tanakh and Bible
Par : ,Formats :
Disponible dans votre compte client Decitre ou Furet du Nord dès validation de votre commande. Le format ePub est :
- Compatible avec une lecture sur My Vivlio (smartphone, tablette, ordinateur)
- Compatible avec une lecture sur liseuses Vivlio
- Pour les liseuses autres que Vivlio, vous devez utiliser le logiciel Adobe Digital Edition. Non compatible avec la lecture sur les liseuses Kindle, Remarkable et Sony
, qui est-ce ?Notre partenaire de plateforme de lecture numérique où vous retrouverez l'ensemble de vos ebooks gratuitement
Pour en savoir plus sur nos ebooks, consultez notre aide en ligne ici
C'est si simple ! Lisez votre ebook avec l'app Vivlio sur votre tablette, mobile ou ordinateur :
- FormatePub
- ISBN8993950631
- EAN9798993950631
- Date de parution28/11/2025
- Protection num.pas de protection
- Infos supplémentairesepub
- ÉditeurA PRECISER
Résumé
The Case of History vs. the Tanakh and the Bible is not about attacking anyone's faith. It's about asking the basic questions most people never stop to ask. If a book claims to record real events, real people, real timelines, and real history, then the evidence should back it up. This volume puts the story under the light, using the same standard of proof that historians, archaeologists, and scholars use for any other ancient text.
This is not the "final answer" to everything. It's the beginning of the case. The reader becomes the judge. The evidence comes from credible researchers in archaeology, ancient Near Eastern studies, linguistics, and history. They raise serious questions about timelines, historicity of kings, battles, and events that the Bible presents as literal history. This book asks:Does the historical record agree with the biblical record?Where do the timelines line up, and where do they fall apart?What claims can be supported, and what claims remain unproven?The goal isn't to force a conclusion, but to open the case.
To lay out the documents, the facts, and the contradictions so the reader can see the difference between tradition and history. This work is not meant to close the conversation. It is meant to start it. It hands the files over to the reader and simply says: "Here is the evidence. Now you decide."
This is not the "final answer" to everything. It's the beginning of the case. The reader becomes the judge. The evidence comes from credible researchers in archaeology, ancient Near Eastern studies, linguistics, and history. They raise serious questions about timelines, historicity of kings, battles, and events that the Bible presents as literal history. This book asks:Does the historical record agree with the biblical record?Where do the timelines line up, and where do they fall apart?What claims can be supported, and what claims remain unproven?The goal isn't to force a conclusion, but to open the case.
To lay out the documents, the facts, and the contradictions so the reader can see the difference between tradition and history. This work is not meant to close the conversation. It is meant to start it. It hands the files over to the reader and simply says: "Here is the evidence. Now you decide."
