SOLDES
Jusqu'à -70% sur une sélection d'articles*
Strategic Emotional Language in Political News: An Analysis of Media Formulas
Par :Formats :
Disponible dans votre compte client Decitre ou Furet du Nord dès validation de votre commande. Le format ePub est :
- Compatible avec une lecture sur My Vivlio (smartphone, tablette, ordinateur)
- Compatible avec une lecture sur liseuses Vivlio
- Pour les liseuses autres que Vivlio, vous devez utiliser le logiciel Adobe Digital Edition. Non compatible avec la lecture sur les liseuses Kindle, Remarkable et Sony
, qui est-ce ?Notre partenaire de plateforme de lecture numérique où vous retrouverez l'ensemble de vos ebooks gratuitement
Pour en savoir plus sur nos ebooks, consultez notre aide en ligne ici
C'est si simple ! Lisez votre ebook avec l'app Vivlio sur votre tablette, mobile ou ordinateur :
- FormatePub
- ISBN8231830077
- EAN9798231830077
- Date de parution18/06/2025
- Protection num.pas de protection
- Infos supplémentairesepub
- ÉditeurWalzone Press
Résumé
The SW & Associates Think Tank presents a critical analysis of strategic emotional language in political news, identifying pervasive "fear-blame formulas" that shape public discourse. The research, based on an extensive review of top political news articles and videos uncovers how fear-inducing rhetoric and blame attribution are deliberately employed persuasive tools, not mere byproducts of political communication.
Key findings highlight recurring patterns such as "Threat-Then-Blame" and "Common Enemy Mobilization, " where perceived threats are linked to specific culprits to influence public sentiment. These formulas, leveraging rhetorical devices and media framing, are shown to significantly impact public opinion, deepen political polarization, and affect democratic engagement. For instance, fear appeals can both mobilize and disengage audiences, while targeted blame erodes trust in institutions and political actors.
The report emphasizes that the strategic deployment of fear and blame is a powerful force actively shaping the political environment. It provides crucial insights into how these communication tactics operate across diverse media outlets and political issues. SW & Associations recommends enhanced media literacy for consumers, urging them to critically evaluate emotionally charged content and diversify their news sources.
For political communicators and media organizations, the report advocates for a shift towards ethical practices that prioritize informed participation and transparency over manipulative emotional appeals. This research underscores the urgent need for a more discerning public and responsible communication to foster healthier democratic discourse.
Key findings highlight recurring patterns such as "Threat-Then-Blame" and "Common Enemy Mobilization, " where perceived threats are linked to specific culprits to influence public sentiment. These formulas, leveraging rhetorical devices and media framing, are shown to significantly impact public opinion, deepen political polarization, and affect democratic engagement. For instance, fear appeals can both mobilize and disengage audiences, while targeted blame erodes trust in institutions and political actors.
The report emphasizes that the strategic deployment of fear and blame is a powerful force actively shaping the political environment. It provides crucial insights into how these communication tactics operate across diverse media outlets and political issues. SW & Associations recommends enhanced media literacy for consumers, urging them to critically evaluate emotionally charged content and diversify their news sources.
For political communicators and media organizations, the report advocates for a shift towards ethical practices that prioritize informed participation and transparency over manipulative emotional appeals. This research underscores the urgent need for a more discerning public and responsible communication to foster healthier democratic discourse.
