Nationalism And Militarism: Choices And Decisions For Wars
Par :Formats :
Disponible dans votre compte client Decitre ou Furet du Nord dès validation de votre commande. Le format ePub est :
- Compatible avec une lecture sur My Vivlio (smartphone, tablette, ordinateur)
- Compatible avec une lecture sur liseuses Vivlio
- Pour les liseuses autres que Vivlio, vous devez utiliser le logiciel Adobe Digital Edition. Non compatible avec la lecture sur les liseuses Kindle, Remarkable et Sony
, qui est-ce ?Notre partenaire de plateforme de lecture numérique où vous retrouverez l'ensemble de vos ebooks gratuitement
Pour en savoir plus sur nos ebooks, consultez notre aide en ligne ici
C'est si simple ! Lisez votre ebook avec l'app Vivlio sur votre tablette, mobile ou ordinateur :
- FormatePub
- ISBN8223961444
- EAN9798223961444
- Date de parution21/08/2023
- Protection num.pas de protection
- Infos supplémentairesepub
- ÉditeurDraft2Digital
Résumé
Nationalism and militarism are closely intertwined. They are often the very justification and reason for wars. Can nationalism exist without militarism?This is truly a question that is foremost in the mind of people who are trying very hard to achieve global peace, in the midst of the many conflicts and wars between nations and superpowers in the world today. The answer is yes, if all nations demilitarize and keep only police force to maintain peace and stability.
Some people might say that the idea of a demilitarized united world is plainly absurd and untenable because it would be impossible to prevent wars of aggression and greed waged by a great variety of hostile forces in the world. But, ironically, all across the world, the military forces of almost every country have steadily but almost imperceptibly changed from a national self-defence force into an armed forces to protect the ruling power and the ruling elite.
For the proof of this, just look at how often have military forces all over the world been used for self defence and how often they have been used for aggression, for foreign intervention, or for military coup against the government, or to prop up existing government or regime. Indeed, to secure lasting peace for the world in the future, humankind has no choice but to plan for a future without the continuing proliferation and reinforcing of the already highly lethal military forces.
Some people might say that the idea of a demilitarized united world is plainly absurd and untenable because it would be impossible to prevent wars of aggression and greed waged by a great variety of hostile forces in the world. But, ironically, all across the world, the military forces of almost every country have steadily but almost imperceptibly changed from a national self-defence force into an armed forces to protect the ruling power and the ruling elite.
For the proof of this, just look at how often have military forces all over the world been used for self defence and how often they have been used for aggression, for foreign intervention, or for military coup against the government, or to prop up existing government or regime. Indeed, to secure lasting peace for the world in the future, humankind has no choice but to plan for a future without the continuing proliferation and reinforcing of the already highly lethal military forces.
Nationalism and militarism are closely intertwined. They are often the very justification and reason for wars. Can nationalism exist without militarism?This is truly a question that is foremost in the mind of people who are trying very hard to achieve global peace, in the midst of the many conflicts and wars between nations and superpowers in the world today. The answer is yes, if all nations demilitarize and keep only police force to maintain peace and stability.
Some people might say that the idea of a demilitarized united world is plainly absurd and untenable because it would be impossible to prevent wars of aggression and greed waged by a great variety of hostile forces in the world. But, ironically, all across the world, the military forces of almost every country have steadily but almost imperceptibly changed from a national self-defence force into an armed forces to protect the ruling power and the ruling elite.
For the proof of this, just look at how often have military forces all over the world been used for self defence and how often they have been used for aggression, for foreign intervention, or for military coup against the government, or to prop up existing government or regime. Indeed, to secure lasting peace for the world in the future, humankind has no choice but to plan for a future without the continuing proliferation and reinforcing of the already highly lethal military forces.
Some people might say that the idea of a demilitarized united world is plainly absurd and untenable because it would be impossible to prevent wars of aggression and greed waged by a great variety of hostile forces in the world. But, ironically, all across the world, the military forces of almost every country have steadily but almost imperceptibly changed from a national self-defence force into an armed forces to protect the ruling power and the ruling elite.
For the proof of this, just look at how often have military forces all over the world been used for self defence and how often they have been used for aggression, for foreign intervention, or for military coup against the government, or to prop up existing government or regime. Indeed, to secure lasting peace for the world in the future, humankind has no choice but to plan for a future without the continuing proliferation and reinforcing of the already highly lethal military forces.
A propos de Terry Nettle
2,99 €
