Economic Analysis of Decentralisation in Rural Ghana
Par :Formats :
- Paiement en ligne :
- Livraison à domicile ou en point Mondial Relay indisponible
- Retrait Click and Collect en magasin gratuit
- Nombre de pages150
- ISBN3-631-50355-5
- EAN9783631503553
- Date de parution01/02/2003
- CollectionDevelopment Economics and Poli
- ÉditeurPeter Lang
Résumé
Many countries around the world have been attempting – for several reasons and with various degrees of intention and success – to create or strengthen local governments in recent years. Ghana is one of these countries and since 1998 has been going through a decentralisation process, that is moving decision-making from the national (center) to the district and community levels – a bottom up approach.
Many rationales for decentralisation may be discerned in the literature and in practice. The most common theoretical rationales for decentralisation are : to attain allocative efficiency in the face of different local preferences for public goods and services and equity and distributional concerns – poverty reduction. In this context, this study performs an economic analysis of decentralisation in rural Ghana specifically addressing the following issues : has the decentralisation helped in the delivery of public goods and services and to what extent has the access to public goods and services helped to reduce poverty ? Education, health and water were the public goods and services studied.
Quantitative and qualitative techniques are used to address theses issues.
Many rationales for decentralisation may be discerned in the literature and in practice. The most common theoretical rationales for decentralisation are : to attain allocative efficiency in the face of different local preferences for public goods and services and equity and distributional concerns – poverty reduction. In this context, this study performs an economic analysis of decentralisation in rural Ghana specifically addressing the following issues : has the decentralisation helped in the delivery of public goods and services and to what extent has the access to public goods and services helped to reduce poverty ? Education, health and water were the public goods and services studied.
Quantitative and qualitative techniques are used to address theses issues.
Many countries around the world have been attempting – for several reasons and with various degrees of intention and success – to create or strengthen local governments in recent years. Ghana is one of these countries and since 1998 has been going through a decentralisation process, that is moving decision-making from the national (center) to the district and community levels – a bottom up approach.
Many rationales for decentralisation may be discerned in the literature and in practice. The most common theoretical rationales for decentralisation are : to attain allocative efficiency in the face of different local preferences for public goods and services and equity and distributional concerns – poverty reduction. In this context, this study performs an economic analysis of decentralisation in rural Ghana specifically addressing the following issues : has the decentralisation helped in the delivery of public goods and services and to what extent has the access to public goods and services helped to reduce poverty ? Education, health and water were the public goods and services studied.
Quantitative and qualitative techniques are used to address theses issues.
Many rationales for decentralisation may be discerned in the literature and in practice. The most common theoretical rationales for decentralisation are : to attain allocative efficiency in the face of different local preferences for public goods and services and equity and distributional concerns – poverty reduction. In this context, this study performs an economic analysis of decentralisation in rural Ghana specifically addressing the following issues : has the decentralisation helped in the delivery of public goods and services and to what extent has the access to public goods and services helped to reduce poverty ? Education, health and water were the public goods and services studied.
Quantitative and qualitative techniques are used to address theses issues.