SOLDES
Jusqu'à -70% sur une sélection d'articles*
The Life Sciences, Torture, Intuition and Imagination.. Claude Bernard Uncut
Par :Formats :
Expédié sous 21 jours
Cet article sera commandé chez un fournisseur et vous sera envoyé 21 jours après la date de votre commande.
- Paiement en ligne :
- Livraison à domicile ou en point Mondial Relay estimée à partir du 20 juilletCet article sera commandé chez un fournisseur et vous sera envoyé 21 jours après la date de votre commande.
- Retrait Click and Collect en magasin gratuit
- Livraison à domicile ou en point Mondial Relay estimée à partir du 20 juillet
- Réservation en ligne avec paiement en magasin :
- Indisponible pour réserver et payer en magasin
- Nombre de pages118
- PrésentationBroché
- Poids0.176 kg
- Dimensions13,5 cm × 21,5 cm × 0,8 cm
- ISBN978-2-322-60066-3
- EAN9782322600663
- Date de parution29/03/2026
- ÉditeurBooks on Demand
Résumé
Focused on the life and work of the founder of modern experimental medicine, namely nineteenth-century French physiologist and playwright Claude Bernard, this essay gives its readers reasonable ground to consider the institutionalization of the experimental method as sole method of scientific inquiry in the life sciences as being perhaps one of the greatest deceptions in the history of modern medicine.
As a matter of fact, the author's non-selective reading of Bernard's scientific writings reveals that the latter dismissed scientific experimentation on the living, which he called "vivisection, " because it was "torture, " in his own word, and because it could easily be avoided, since human beings can rely on soft, self-sufficient means of accessing knowledge such as intuition, imagination and dreams, according to him.
Sicard's essay attempts to make sense of Bernard's enigmatic choice to carry out experiments anyway, which he considered as a form of creative writing, while striving to understand why violence, and specifically torture, persists in most areas of human activity in today's society.
As a matter of fact, the author's non-selective reading of Bernard's scientific writings reveals that the latter dismissed scientific experimentation on the living, which he called "vivisection, " because it was "torture, " in his own word, and because it could easily be avoided, since human beings can rely on soft, self-sufficient means of accessing knowledge such as intuition, imagination and dreams, according to him.
Sicard's essay attempts to make sense of Bernard's enigmatic choice to carry out experiments anyway, which he considered as a form of creative writing, while striving to understand why violence, and specifically torture, persists in most areas of human activity in today's society.





