Eurêka
E-book
8,49 €
Undoing Art
Par : ,Formats :
Disponible dans votre compte client Decitre ou Furet du Nord dès validation de votre commande. Le format PDF protégé est :
- Compatible avec une lecture sur My Vivlio (smartphone, tablette, ordinateur)
- Compatible avec une lecture sur liseuses Vivlio
- Pour les liseuses autres que Vivlio, vous devez utiliser le logiciel Adobe Digital Edition. Non compatible avec la lecture sur les liseuses Kindle, Remarkable et Sony
- Non compatible avec un achat hors France métropolitaine
, qui est-ce ?Notre partenaire de plateforme de lecture numérique où vous retrouverez l'ensemble de vos ebooks gratuitement
Pour en savoir plus sur nos ebooks, consultez notre aide en ligne ici
C'est si simple ! Lisez votre ebook avec l'app Vivlio sur votre tablette, mobile ou ordinateur :
- FormatPDF
- ISBN978-88-229-0908-4
- EAN9788822909084
- Date de parution13/07/2017
- Protection num.Adobe DRM
- Taille2 Mo
- Infos supplémentairespdf
- ÉditeurQuodlibet
Résumé
« Here is, we think, the point. It doesn't matter for what reason the writer or painter or lover destroys the creation: the real point is that destruction itself, like a gigantic statement. It is, in fact, something of an excitation, a stimulation to further thought: what is this ACTION about? »What do Stéphane Mallarmé, Antonin Artaud, Meret Oppenheim, Asger Jorn, Yoko Ono, Tom Phillips and Martin Arnold have in common? Whereas a wealth of critics have diagnosed contemporary art's preoccupations with madness, depression and self-abuse as well as its tendency to cultivate an (anti-)aesthetics of the negative, the excremental and the abject (say, from the Vienna Action Group to Serrano, McCarthy or Delvoye), much less attention has been paid to how modern and contemporary artists and public have thrived on the destruction, disfiguration and obliteration of work by the artists and/or by that of others.
From Artaud's « terminal » notebooks to the recent upsurge in « erasure poetics », the history of « undoing » art deserves to be recounted in a positive mode and rescued from popular narratives of the decline and death of the avant-garde.
From Artaud's « terminal » notebooks to the recent upsurge in « erasure poetics », the history of « undoing » art deserves to be recounted in a positive mode and rescued from popular narratives of the decline and death of the avant-garde.
« Here is, we think, the point. It doesn't matter for what reason the writer or painter or lover destroys the creation: the real point is that destruction itself, like a gigantic statement. It is, in fact, something of an excitation, a stimulation to further thought: what is this ACTION about? »What do Stéphane Mallarmé, Antonin Artaud, Meret Oppenheim, Asger Jorn, Yoko Ono, Tom Phillips and Martin Arnold have in common? Whereas a wealth of critics have diagnosed contemporary art's preoccupations with madness, depression and self-abuse as well as its tendency to cultivate an (anti-)aesthetics of the negative, the excremental and the abject (say, from the Vienna Action Group to Serrano, McCarthy or Delvoye), much less attention has been paid to how modern and contemporary artists and public have thrived on the destruction, disfiguration and obliteration of work by the artists and/or by that of others.
From Artaud's « terminal » notebooks to the recent upsurge in « erasure poetics », the history of « undoing » art deserves to be recounted in a positive mode and rescued from popular narratives of the decline and death of the avant-garde.
From Artaud's « terminal » notebooks to the recent upsurge in « erasure poetics », the history of « undoing » art deserves to be recounted in a positive mode and rescued from popular narratives of the decline and death of the avant-garde.
