The Fair Hearing
E-book
3,49 €
Nouveauté
The Quality Committee
Par :Formats :
Disponible dans votre compte client Decitre ou Furet du Nord dès validation de votre commande. Le format ePub est :
- Compatible avec une lecture sur My Vivlio (smartphone, tablette, ordinateur)
- Compatible avec une lecture sur liseuses Vivlio
- Pour les liseuses autres que Vivlio, vous devez utiliser le logiciel Adobe Digital Edition. Non compatible avec la lecture sur les liseuses Kindle, Remarkable et Sony
, qui est-ce ?Notre partenaire de plateforme de lecture numérique où vous retrouverez l'ensemble de vos ebooks gratuitement
Pour en savoir plus sur nos ebooks, consultez notre aide en ligne ici
C'est si simple ! Lisez votre ebook avec l'app Vivlio sur votre tablette, mobile ou ordinateur :
- FormatePub
- ISBN8235982253
- EAN9798235982253
- Date de parution20/07/2026
- Protection num.pas de protection
- Infos supplémentairesepub
- ÉditeurIoakim Ioakim
Résumé
An associate professor of surgery at a major academic medical center discovers a troubling pattern in her institution's surgical outcomes data. During routine reconciliation work for the Department of Surgery Quality Committee, Dr. Marisol Pemberton-Halverson identifies discrepancies that point to systematically unreported complications in two surgical divisions. The directional concentration of the data cannot be explained by ordinary institutional mechanisms.
What follows is a meticulous institutional investigation conducted under institutional-research-integrity protocol, with outside counsel, departmental pressure, and the weight of institutional reputation balanced against the scientist's obligation to follow the data wherever it leads. Set against the detailed procedural backdrop of contemporary academic medicine, this institutional thriller explores professional restraint, document discipline, and the cost of institutional truth-telling in the modern clinical research environment.
What follows is a meticulous institutional investigation conducted under institutional-research-integrity protocol, with outside counsel, departmental pressure, and the weight of institutional reputation balanced against the scientist's obligation to follow the data wherever it leads. Set against the detailed procedural backdrop of contemporary academic medicine, this institutional thriller explores professional restraint, document discipline, and the cost of institutional truth-telling in the modern clinical research environment.
