The Psychopathic Enigma - Insightful Self-Reports
Par :Formats :
Disponible dans votre compte client Decitre ou Furet du Nord dès validation de votre commande. Le format ePub est :
- Compatible avec une lecture sur My Vivlio (smartphone, tablette, ordinateur)
- Compatible avec une lecture sur liseuses Vivlio
- Pour les liseuses autres que Vivlio, vous devez utiliser le logiciel Adobe Digital Edition. Non compatible avec la lecture sur les liseuses Kindle, Remarkable et Sony
, qui est-ce ?Notre partenaire de plateforme de lecture numérique où vous retrouverez l'ensemble de vos ebooks gratuitement
Pour en savoir plus sur nos ebooks, consultez notre aide en ligne ici
C'est si simple ! Lisez votre ebook avec l'app Vivlio sur votre tablette, mobile ou ordinateur :
- FormatePub
- ISBN8223358053
- EAN9798223358053
- Date de parution27/12/2023
- Protection num.pas de protection
- Infos supplémentairesepub
- ÉditeurDraft2Digital
Résumé
In this book, the self-reports of psychopaths are presented and analyzed. These data provide more insight into the complex phenomenon of psychopathy. Psychopaths might consider their features, attitude and behavior quite differently than their non-psychopathic counterparts and psychiatric researchers do. This distinction might be the result of a) ignorance of non-psychopaths about the true nature of this complex disorder, b) a very different perspective of psychopaths and non-psychopaths in analyzing this phenomenon of psychopathy, c) the fact that most empirical data is gathered from incarnated, criminal populations who are very able to manipulate tests (most of them know much about the Hare, 1991, PCL-R), assessments, researchers, and therapists (just for fun, revenge, hatred, or disgust) and d) a lack of utilization of and unavailability of reliable and voluntary self-reports of psychopaths in informal settings, and so on.
Informal, non-academic and non-clinical settings are important because the psychopaths I investigated displayed hate against formal academic and clinical settings because they consider them as bulwarks of repressing authority. They consider current theories and concepts of psychopathy as inadequate, incomplete, incorrect, stereotypes which bring about stigmatization
Informal, non-academic and non-clinical settings are important because the psychopaths I investigated displayed hate against formal academic and clinical settings because they consider them as bulwarks of repressing authority. They consider current theories and concepts of psychopathy as inadequate, incomplete, incorrect, stereotypes which bring about stigmatization
In this book, the self-reports of psychopaths are presented and analyzed. These data provide more insight into the complex phenomenon of psychopathy. Psychopaths might consider their features, attitude and behavior quite differently than their non-psychopathic counterparts and psychiatric researchers do. This distinction might be the result of a) ignorance of non-psychopaths about the true nature of this complex disorder, b) a very different perspective of psychopaths and non-psychopaths in analyzing this phenomenon of psychopathy, c) the fact that most empirical data is gathered from incarnated, criminal populations who are very able to manipulate tests (most of them know much about the Hare, 1991, PCL-R), assessments, researchers, and therapists (just for fun, revenge, hatred, or disgust) and d) a lack of utilization of and unavailability of reliable and voluntary self-reports of psychopaths in informal settings, and so on.
Informal, non-academic and non-clinical settings are important because the psychopaths I investigated displayed hate against formal academic and clinical settings because they consider them as bulwarks of repressing authority. They consider current theories and concepts of psychopathy as inadequate, incomplete, incorrect, stereotypes which bring about stigmatization
Informal, non-academic and non-clinical settings are important because the psychopaths I investigated displayed hate against formal academic and clinical settings because they consider them as bulwarks of repressing authority. They consider current theories and concepts of psychopathy as inadequate, incomplete, incorrect, stereotypes which bring about stigmatization
