29,00 €
The Direction of Science Versus String Theory
Par :Formats :
Disponible dans votre compte client Decitre ou Furet du Nord dès validation de votre commande. Le format ePub est :
- Compatible avec une lecture sur My Vivlio (smartphone, tablette, ordinateur)
- Compatible avec une lecture sur liseuses Vivlio
- Pour les liseuses autres que Vivlio, vous devez utiliser le logiciel Adobe Digital Edition. Non compatible avec la lecture sur les liseuses Kindle, Remarkable et Sony
, qui est-ce ?Notre partenaire de plateforme de lecture numérique où vous retrouverez l'ensemble de vos ebooks gratuitement
Pour en savoir plus sur nos ebooks, consultez notre aide en ligne ici
C'est si simple ! Lisez votre ebook avec l'app Vivlio sur votre tablette, mobile ou ordinateur :
- FormatePub
- ISBN8201626402
- EAN9798201626402
- Date de parution16/05/2021
- Protection num.pas de protection
- Infos supplémentairesepub
- ÉditeurJL
Résumé
There are scientists that have speculated that, since science involves abstraction, generalizations across facts, and the generalization of causes and theories across empirical phenomena, the direction of science is to increasingly unify forces and causes until there is a single general theory unifying all of the forces of nature. The most prominent contemporary example of this attempt to unify all of the forces of nature in a single theory is string theory or superstring theory.
String theorists have attempted to emulate Albert Einstein's call for physicists to attempt to unify all of the forces of physics in a single theory, sometimes called a "theory of everything." String Theory has been called "untestable, " empirically unverifiable, and "post-empiricist, " and I use another standard by which String Theory might be evaluated, a Standard of Instrument Design and Technological Productivity.
Moreover, I seek to show that, instead of attempting to unify all of the forces of nature in a single theory or "theory of everything, " it is possible to identify and separate the forces of nature in relation to each other, and order and rank the forces of nature by their capacity to generate branching patterns in the biological sciences or the physical sciences. Ranking forces by their capacity to generate branching patterns (or other shapes or patterns), in the biological sciences or in the physical sciences, is more positivist and testable than attempts to unify all of the forces of nature in a single theory.
String theorists have attempted to emulate Albert Einstein's call for physicists to attempt to unify all of the forces of physics in a single theory, sometimes called a "theory of everything." String Theory has been called "untestable, " empirically unverifiable, and "post-empiricist, " and I use another standard by which String Theory might be evaluated, a Standard of Instrument Design and Technological Productivity.
Moreover, I seek to show that, instead of attempting to unify all of the forces of nature in a single theory or "theory of everything, " it is possible to identify and separate the forces of nature in relation to each other, and order and rank the forces of nature by their capacity to generate branching patterns in the biological sciences or the physical sciences. Ranking forces by their capacity to generate branching patterns (or other shapes or patterns), in the biological sciences or in the physical sciences, is more positivist and testable than attempts to unify all of the forces of nature in a single theory.
There are scientists that have speculated that, since science involves abstraction, generalizations across facts, and the generalization of causes and theories across empirical phenomena, the direction of science is to increasingly unify forces and causes until there is a single general theory unifying all of the forces of nature. The most prominent contemporary example of this attempt to unify all of the forces of nature in a single theory is string theory or superstring theory.
String theorists have attempted to emulate Albert Einstein's call for physicists to attempt to unify all of the forces of physics in a single theory, sometimes called a "theory of everything." String Theory has been called "untestable, " empirically unverifiable, and "post-empiricist, " and I use another standard by which String Theory might be evaluated, a Standard of Instrument Design and Technological Productivity.
Moreover, I seek to show that, instead of attempting to unify all of the forces of nature in a single theory or "theory of everything, " it is possible to identify and separate the forces of nature in relation to each other, and order and rank the forces of nature by their capacity to generate branching patterns in the biological sciences or the physical sciences. Ranking forces by their capacity to generate branching patterns (or other shapes or patterns), in the biological sciences or in the physical sciences, is more positivist and testable than attempts to unify all of the forces of nature in a single theory.
String theorists have attempted to emulate Albert Einstein's call for physicists to attempt to unify all of the forces of physics in a single theory, sometimes called a "theory of everything." String Theory has been called "untestable, " empirically unverifiable, and "post-empiricist, " and I use another standard by which String Theory might be evaluated, a Standard of Instrument Design and Technological Productivity.
Moreover, I seek to show that, instead of attempting to unify all of the forces of nature in a single theory or "theory of everything, " it is possible to identify and separate the forces of nature in relation to each other, and order and rank the forces of nature by their capacity to generate branching patterns in the biological sciences or the physical sciences. Ranking forces by their capacity to generate branching patterns (or other shapes or patterns), in the biological sciences or in the physical sciences, is more positivist and testable than attempts to unify all of the forces of nature in a single theory.
A propos de Christopher Portosa Stevens