SOLDES

Jusqu'à -70% sur une sélection d'articles*

Summary of Lydia Denworth's Friendship

Par : Everest Media
Offrir maintenant
Ou planifier dans votre panier
Disponible dans votre compte client Decitre ou Furet du Nord dès validation de votre commande. Le format ePub est :
  • Compatible avec une lecture sur My Vivlio (smartphone, tablette, ordinateur)
  • Compatible avec une lecture sur liseuses Vivlio
  • Pour les liseuses autres que Vivlio, vous devez utiliser le logiciel Adobe Digital Edition. Non compatible avec la lecture sur les liseuses Kindle, Remarkable et Sony
Logo Vivlio, qui est-ce ?

Notre partenaire de plateforme de lecture numérique où vous retrouverez l'ensemble de vos ebooks gratuitement

Pour en savoir plus sur nos ebooks, consultez notre aide en ligne ici
C'est si simple ! Lisez votre ebook avec l'app Vivlio sur votre tablette, mobile ou ordinateur :
Google PlayApp Store
  • FormatePub
  • ISBN978-1-6693-8014-6
  • EAN9781669380146
  • Date de parution06/04/2022
  • Protection num.Digital Watermarking
  • Taille1 Mo
  • Infos supplémentairesepub
  • ÉditeurEverest Media LLC

Résumé

Please note: This is a companion version & not the original book. Sample Book Insights: #1 The modern science of friendship began when psychiatrist John Bowlby met ethologist Robert Hinde in 1954. They had been invited to speak at an academic meeting in London, and they became close friends. #2 Attachment is the basis of friendship, but it is also what makes it so difficult to define. It is a form of socialization that involves emotion, conversation, and the inner workings of the mind.
It is not as obvious in other types of social interaction. #3 Aristotle believed that friendship was one of life's unalloyed pleasures. He believed that philia came in different flavors: for profit, for pleasure, and for virtue. He also believed that friendship was necessary for all people, rich and poor, young and old, male and female. #4 The psychologist John Bowlby was the first to recognize the importance of social connection, and he saw it as a basis for morality.
He believed that early relationships were of fundamental importance, but when he reviewed the existing research, he could find little that framed the issue the way he saw it.