OFFRE LISEUSES
Une liseuse achetée = une housse offerte* jusqu'au 21 juin
Summary of James Reason's Human Error
Par :Formats :
Disponible dans votre compte client Decitre ou Furet du Nord dès validation de votre commande. Le format ePub est :
- Compatible avec une lecture sur My Vivlio (smartphone, tablette, ordinateur)
- Compatible avec une lecture sur liseuses Vivlio
- Pour les liseuses autres que Vivlio, vous devez utiliser le logiciel Adobe Digital Edition. Non compatible avec la lecture sur les liseuses Kindle, Remarkable et Sony
, qui est-ce ?Notre partenaire de plateforme de lecture numérique où vous retrouverez l'ensemble de vos ebooks gratuitement
Pour en savoir plus sur nos ebooks, consultez notre aide en ligne ici
- FormatePub
- ISBN978-1-6693-9408-2
- EAN9781669394082
- Date de parution29/05/2022
- Protection num.Digital Watermarking
- Taille1 Mo
- Infos supplémentairesepub
- ÉditeurEverest Media LLC
Résumé
Please note: This is a companion version & not the original book.
Sample Book Insights:
#1 The past decade has seen a rapid increase in what might loosely be called studies of errors for their own sake. The most obvious impetus for this renewed interest has been a growing public concern over the terrible cost of human error.
#2 The two sides of the same coin are automaticity, which makes slips or actions not planned inevitable, and resource limitations, which contribute to informational overload and data loss.
#3 The search for human error is not as abundant or as varied as it might seem.
While errors are much rarer than correct actions, they typically take a limited number of forms. #4 The two targets in Figure 1. 1 show a pattern of ten shots, one fired by rifleman A, the other by rifleman B. A's shots were around the bull's eye, but the grouping was poor. B's shots fell into a tight cluster, but at a distance from the bull's eye.
While errors are much rarer than correct actions, they typically take a limited number of forms. #4 The two targets in Figure 1. 1 show a pattern of ten shots, one fired by rifleman A, the other by rifleman B. A's shots were around the bull's eye, but the grouping was poor. B's shots fell into a tight cluster, but at a distance from the bull's eye.























