Stanford Law Review: Volume 64, Issue 6 - June 2012
Par :Formats :
Disponible dans votre compte client Decitre ou Furet du Nord dès validation de votre commande. Le format ePub est :
- Compatible avec une lecture sur My Vivlio (smartphone, tablette, ordinateur)
- Compatible avec une lecture sur liseuses Vivlio
- Pour les liseuses autres que Vivlio, vous devez utiliser le logiciel Adobe Digital Edition. Non compatible avec la lecture sur les liseuses Kindle, Remarkable et Sony
, qui est-ce ?Notre partenaire de plateforme de lecture numérique où vous retrouverez l'ensemble de vos ebooks gratuitement
Pour en savoir plus sur nos ebooks, consultez notre aide en ligne ici
C'est si simple ! Lisez votre ebook avec l'app Vivlio sur votre tablette, mobile ou ordinateur :
- FormatePub
- ISBN978-1-61027-938-3
- EAN9781610279383
- Date de parution31/12/2013
- Protection num.pas de protection
- Infos supplémentairesepub
- ÉditeurMark Childress
Résumé
This June 2012 issue of the Stanford Law Review (the last for the academic year) contains studies of law, economics, and social policy by recognized scholars on diverse topics of interest to the academic and professional community. Contents for the issue include:"Beyond DOMA: Choice of State Law in Federal Statutes": William Baude"Does Shareholder Proxy Access Damage Share Value in Small Publicly Traded Companies?": Thomas Stratmann & J.
W. VerretBook Review, "Infringement Conflation": Peter S. MenellNote, "Pinching the President's Prosecutorial Prerogative: Can Congress Use Its Purse Power to Block Khalid Sheikh Mohammed's Transfer to the United States?": Nicolas L. MartinezNote, "The American Jury: Can Noncitizens Still Be Excluded?": Amy R. MotomuraIn the ebook edition, all the footnotes, graphs, and tables of contents (including those for individual articles) are fully linked, properly scalable, and functional; the original note numbering is retained.
Also, the URLs in notes are active; and the issue is properly formatted for ereaders.
W. VerretBook Review, "Infringement Conflation": Peter S. MenellNote, "Pinching the President's Prosecutorial Prerogative: Can Congress Use Its Purse Power to Block Khalid Sheikh Mohammed's Transfer to the United States?": Nicolas L. MartinezNote, "The American Jury: Can Noncitizens Still Be Excluded?": Amy R. MotomuraIn the ebook edition, all the footnotes, graphs, and tables of contents (including those for individual articles) are fully linked, properly scalable, and functional; the original note numbering is retained.
Also, the URLs in notes are active; and the issue is properly formatted for ereaders.
This June 2012 issue of the Stanford Law Review (the last for the academic year) contains studies of law, economics, and social policy by recognized scholars on diverse topics of interest to the academic and professional community. Contents for the issue include:"Beyond DOMA: Choice of State Law in Federal Statutes": William Baude"Does Shareholder Proxy Access Damage Share Value in Small Publicly Traded Companies?": Thomas Stratmann & J.
W. VerretBook Review, "Infringement Conflation": Peter S. MenellNote, "Pinching the President's Prosecutorial Prerogative: Can Congress Use Its Purse Power to Block Khalid Sheikh Mohammed's Transfer to the United States?": Nicolas L. MartinezNote, "The American Jury: Can Noncitizens Still Be Excluded?": Amy R. MotomuraIn the ebook edition, all the footnotes, graphs, and tables of contents (including those for individual articles) are fully linked, properly scalable, and functional; the original note numbering is retained.
Also, the URLs in notes are active; and the issue is properly formatted for ereaders.
W. VerretBook Review, "Infringement Conflation": Peter S. MenellNote, "Pinching the President's Prosecutorial Prerogative: Can Congress Use Its Purse Power to Block Khalid Sheikh Mohammed's Transfer to the United States?": Nicolas L. MartinezNote, "The American Jury: Can Noncitizens Still Be Excluded?": Amy R. MotomuraIn the ebook edition, all the footnotes, graphs, and tables of contents (including those for individual articles) are fully linked, properly scalable, and functional; the original note numbering is retained.
Also, the URLs in notes are active; and the issue is properly formatted for ereaders.
A propos de Stanford Law Review
5,49 €
