Юридическая Эпистемология И Уже-Право. Bjarne Melkevik, #7
Par :Formats :
Disponible dans votre compte client Decitre ou Furet du Nord dès validation de votre commande. Le format ePub est :
- Compatible avec une lecture sur My Vivlio (smartphone, tablette, ordinateur)
- Compatible avec une lecture sur liseuses Vivlio
- Pour les liseuses autres que Vivlio, vous devez utiliser le logiciel Adobe Digital Edition. Non compatible avec la lecture sur les liseuses Kindle, Remarkable et Sony
, qui est-ce ?Notre partenaire de plateforme de lecture numérique où vous retrouverez l'ensemble de vos ebooks gratuitement
Pour en savoir plus sur nos ebooks, consultez notre aide en ligne ici
C'est si simple ! Lisez votre ebook avec l'app Vivlio sur votre tablette, mobile ou ordinateur :
- FormatePub
- ISBN8227773562
- EAN9798227773562
- Date de parution14/02/2025
- Protection num.pas de protection
- Infos supplémentairesepub
- ÉditeurBig Dog Books, LLC
Résumé
???? ? ??????????? ???? ????????????? ?????????? ? ????????????? ???? ??????? ?????????? ??????, ???????? ????????????? ???????????? ? ??????????? ???????????, ? ?????? ????????????? ??? ?????? ? ??????? ????????????? « ????????????? ?????? », ?? ???????????? ? ????????? ?????????????????? ?????????. ???? ????? ????? ??????????? ? ??????????? ??? ???? ????????? ????? ???????, ??? ???? ???????????? ???? ?????? ??????????? ??????????????.
?????????? ?????????? ??????????? ? ?????????, ????????? ??? ????????, ?????????????? ????????? ? « ???-????? », ??????? ??? ?????? ? ???????? ? ??????? ????? ??????????? ? ???????? ????? ? ???????? « ??????????, ????????? ? ????????? ». ???, ??? ????, ??? « ????-????? », ??????? ??? ??????????????-?????? ????????????? ?????. ??? ????, ??????? ?? ????????? ??? ????? ????????? « ??????????? ????????????? ? ???-????? », ???????? ?????? ??????????? ?? ??????? ?????.
??? ???????????? ????? ??????? ??????? ????????????, ??????? ?????????? ? ?????? ??????? ??????? ?? ?????? ????????? ??? « ????? ». ??????? ?? ???? ??????????? ??????? ?????? ? ????????????? « ???-????? », ?????, ??????? ????? ??? ???????????? ????? ? ???, ????????? ?????????? ? ??????????? ???? ? ?????? ???? ????????? ????? ???????. ??? ??????? ??????? ???????? ???????????????. ? ????? ?????? ?????????????, ??? ??????? ??????????????, ????????????? ?????? ???????????????? « ???-????? ». ????? ????????, ?????????? ??????? ??????? ????? ? ???????????? ????? II, ???????? ??????????? ???????????? ?????????? ???????????? ??.
?????? (??????, ??????). __________If, in the legal world, epistemology tends towards the unrewarding role of an a priori, ready to transmute itself ideologically into legal methodology, into a theory of interpretation, or simply into a pre-established "theoretical model, " we have a huge and real problem. The aim of our book is consequently to rethink this issue and to do so under the auspices of an interrogation which is itself a theorisation of the meaning of legal epistemology. It is imperative to criticize and evict, as far as possible, the ideological recourse to an "already-law" - a juridical meaning already there in one way or another - and which can act (without any deliberative act of creation) as a justification, foundation and ideology in the field of law, or worse as an " ideo-law " exclusive to its investigator-members of a doctrinal sect.
The three essays that we publish here under the title "Legal Epistemology and Already-Law" seek to reclaim the field. They present a critique of any foundation (and fondationalism), of any justification (and process of justification) and any attempt to turn theory into a paradigm for "law" and legal science. They are critical essays of resistance to these "sirens songs" which, like in Ulysses Epic (in Homer's Odyssey), may well be bewitching and beautiful, but will cause our intellectual and moral shipwreck if we do not stand up to them.
We must never yield to the temptation of believing in the existence of an "already-law", a law already here and there, and magically present in an objective world ready to be plucked by our theory. There is no reason to yield to the irrational. Rather, we must resist, protest and howl epistemologically against the irrationality of an "already-law". Bjarne Melkevik, S. J. D. (Paris II), tenure professor at the Law school at Laval University (Quebec - Canada).
He's the author of more then 20 books in legal philosophy, legal epistemology and legal theory.
?????????? ?????????? ??????????? ? ?????????, ????????? ??? ????????, ?????????????? ????????? ? « ???-????? », ??????? ??? ?????? ? ???????? ? ??????? ????? ??????????? ? ???????? ????? ? ???????? « ??????????, ????????? ? ????????? ». ???, ??? ????, ??? « ????-????? », ??????? ??? ??????????????-?????? ????????????? ?????. ??? ????, ??????? ?? ????????? ??? ????? ????????? « ??????????? ????????????? ? ???-????? », ???????? ?????? ??????????? ?? ??????? ?????.
??? ???????????? ????? ??????? ??????? ????????????, ??????? ?????????? ? ?????? ??????? ??????? ?? ?????? ????????? ??? « ????? ». ??????? ?? ???? ??????????? ??????? ?????? ? ????????????? « ???-????? », ?????, ??????? ????? ??? ???????????? ????? ? ???, ????????? ?????????? ? ??????????? ???? ? ?????? ???? ????????? ????? ???????. ??? ??????? ??????? ???????? ???????????????. ? ????? ?????? ?????????????, ??? ??????? ??????????????, ????????????? ?????? ???????????????? « ???-????? ». ????? ????????, ?????????? ??????? ??????? ????? ? ???????????? ????? II, ???????? ??????????? ???????????? ?????????? ???????????? ??.
?????? (??????, ??????). __________If, in the legal world, epistemology tends towards the unrewarding role of an a priori, ready to transmute itself ideologically into legal methodology, into a theory of interpretation, or simply into a pre-established "theoretical model, " we have a huge and real problem. The aim of our book is consequently to rethink this issue and to do so under the auspices of an interrogation which is itself a theorisation of the meaning of legal epistemology. It is imperative to criticize and evict, as far as possible, the ideological recourse to an "already-law" - a juridical meaning already there in one way or another - and which can act (without any deliberative act of creation) as a justification, foundation and ideology in the field of law, or worse as an " ideo-law " exclusive to its investigator-members of a doctrinal sect.
The three essays that we publish here under the title "Legal Epistemology and Already-Law" seek to reclaim the field. They present a critique of any foundation (and fondationalism), of any justification (and process of justification) and any attempt to turn theory into a paradigm for "law" and legal science. They are critical essays of resistance to these "sirens songs" which, like in Ulysses Epic (in Homer's Odyssey), may well be bewitching and beautiful, but will cause our intellectual and moral shipwreck if we do not stand up to them.
We must never yield to the temptation of believing in the existence of an "already-law", a law already here and there, and magically present in an objective world ready to be plucked by our theory. There is no reason to yield to the irrational. Rather, we must resist, protest and howl epistemologically against the irrationality of an "already-law". Bjarne Melkevik, S. J. D. (Paris II), tenure professor at the Law school at Laval University (Quebec - Canada).
He's the author of more then 20 books in legal philosophy, legal epistemology and legal theory.
???? ? ??????????? ???? ????????????? ?????????? ? ????????????? ???? ??????? ?????????? ??????, ???????? ????????????? ???????????? ? ??????????? ???????????, ? ?????? ????????????? ??? ?????? ? ??????? ????????????? « ????????????? ?????? », ?? ???????????? ? ????????? ?????????????????? ?????????. ???? ????? ????? ??????????? ? ??????????? ??? ???? ????????? ????? ???????, ??? ???? ???????????? ???? ?????? ??????????? ??????????????.
?????????? ?????????? ??????????? ? ?????????, ????????? ??? ????????, ?????????????? ????????? ? « ???-????? », ??????? ??? ?????? ? ???????? ? ??????? ????? ??????????? ? ???????? ????? ? ???????? « ??????????, ????????? ? ????????? ». ???, ??? ????, ??? « ????-????? », ??????? ??? ??????????????-?????? ????????????? ?????. ??? ????, ??????? ?? ????????? ??? ????? ????????? « ??????????? ????????????? ? ???-????? », ???????? ?????? ??????????? ?? ??????? ?????.
??? ???????????? ????? ??????? ??????? ????????????, ??????? ?????????? ? ?????? ??????? ??????? ?? ?????? ????????? ??? « ????? ». ??????? ?? ???? ??????????? ??????? ?????? ? ????????????? « ???-????? », ?????, ??????? ????? ??? ???????????? ????? ? ???, ????????? ?????????? ? ??????????? ???? ? ?????? ???? ????????? ????? ???????. ??? ??????? ??????? ???????? ???????????????. ? ????? ?????? ?????????????, ??? ??????? ??????????????, ????????????? ?????? ???????????????? « ???-????? ». ????? ????????, ?????????? ??????? ??????? ????? ? ???????????? ????? II, ???????? ??????????? ???????????? ?????????? ???????????? ??.
?????? (??????, ??????). __________If, in the legal world, epistemology tends towards the unrewarding role of an a priori, ready to transmute itself ideologically into legal methodology, into a theory of interpretation, or simply into a pre-established "theoretical model, " we have a huge and real problem. The aim of our book is consequently to rethink this issue and to do so under the auspices of an interrogation which is itself a theorisation of the meaning of legal epistemology. It is imperative to criticize and evict, as far as possible, the ideological recourse to an "already-law" - a juridical meaning already there in one way or another - and which can act (without any deliberative act of creation) as a justification, foundation and ideology in the field of law, or worse as an " ideo-law " exclusive to its investigator-members of a doctrinal sect.
The three essays that we publish here under the title "Legal Epistemology and Already-Law" seek to reclaim the field. They present a critique of any foundation (and fondationalism), of any justification (and process of justification) and any attempt to turn theory into a paradigm for "law" and legal science. They are critical essays of resistance to these "sirens songs" which, like in Ulysses Epic (in Homer's Odyssey), may well be bewitching and beautiful, but will cause our intellectual and moral shipwreck if we do not stand up to them.
We must never yield to the temptation of believing in the existence of an "already-law", a law already here and there, and magically present in an objective world ready to be plucked by our theory. There is no reason to yield to the irrational. Rather, we must resist, protest and howl epistemologically against the irrationality of an "already-law". Bjarne Melkevik, S. J. D. (Paris II), tenure professor at the Law school at Laval University (Quebec - Canada).
He's the author of more then 20 books in legal philosophy, legal epistemology and legal theory.
?????????? ?????????? ??????????? ? ?????????, ????????? ??? ????????, ?????????????? ????????? ? « ???-????? », ??????? ??? ?????? ? ???????? ? ??????? ????? ??????????? ? ???????? ????? ? ???????? « ??????????, ????????? ? ????????? ». ???, ??? ????, ??? « ????-????? », ??????? ??? ??????????????-?????? ????????????? ?????. ??? ????, ??????? ?? ????????? ??? ????? ????????? « ??????????? ????????????? ? ???-????? », ???????? ?????? ??????????? ?? ??????? ?????.
??? ???????????? ????? ??????? ??????? ????????????, ??????? ?????????? ? ?????? ??????? ??????? ?? ?????? ????????? ??? « ????? ». ??????? ?? ???? ??????????? ??????? ?????? ? ????????????? « ???-????? », ?????, ??????? ????? ??? ???????????? ????? ? ???, ????????? ?????????? ? ??????????? ???? ? ?????? ???? ????????? ????? ???????. ??? ??????? ??????? ???????? ???????????????. ? ????? ?????? ?????????????, ??? ??????? ??????????????, ????????????? ?????? ???????????????? « ???-????? ». ????? ????????, ?????????? ??????? ??????? ????? ? ???????????? ????? II, ???????? ??????????? ???????????? ?????????? ???????????? ??.
?????? (??????, ??????). __________If, in the legal world, epistemology tends towards the unrewarding role of an a priori, ready to transmute itself ideologically into legal methodology, into a theory of interpretation, or simply into a pre-established "theoretical model, " we have a huge and real problem. The aim of our book is consequently to rethink this issue and to do so under the auspices of an interrogation which is itself a theorisation of the meaning of legal epistemology. It is imperative to criticize and evict, as far as possible, the ideological recourse to an "already-law" - a juridical meaning already there in one way or another - and which can act (without any deliberative act of creation) as a justification, foundation and ideology in the field of law, or worse as an " ideo-law " exclusive to its investigator-members of a doctrinal sect.
The three essays that we publish here under the title "Legal Epistemology and Already-Law" seek to reclaim the field. They present a critique of any foundation (and fondationalism), of any justification (and process of justification) and any attempt to turn theory into a paradigm for "law" and legal science. They are critical essays of resistance to these "sirens songs" which, like in Ulysses Epic (in Homer's Odyssey), may well be bewitching and beautiful, but will cause our intellectual and moral shipwreck if we do not stand up to them.
We must never yield to the temptation of believing in the existence of an "already-law", a law already here and there, and magically present in an objective world ready to be plucked by our theory. There is no reason to yield to the irrational. Rather, we must resist, protest and howl epistemologically against the irrationality of an "already-law". Bjarne Melkevik, S. J. D. (Paris II), tenure professor at the Law school at Laval University (Quebec - Canada).
He's the author of more then 20 books in legal philosophy, legal epistemology and legal theory.
A propos de Bjarne Melkevik
9,49 €
9,49 €
