SOLDES
Jusqu'à -70% sur une sélection d'articles*
Harvard Law Review: Volume 129, Number 7 - May 2016
Par :Formats :
Disponible dans votre compte client Decitre ou Furet du Nord dès validation de votre commande. Le format ePub est :
- Compatible avec une lecture sur My Vivlio (smartphone, tablette, ordinateur)
- Compatible avec une lecture sur liseuses Vivlio
- Pour les liseuses autres que Vivlio, vous devez utiliser le logiciel Adobe Digital Edition. Non compatible avec la lecture sur les liseuses Kindle, Remarkable et Sony
, qui est-ce ?Notre partenaire de plateforme de lecture numérique où vous retrouverez l'ensemble de vos ebooks gratuitement
Pour en savoir plus sur nos ebooks, consultez notre aide en ligne ici
- FormatePub
- ISBN978-1-61027-802-7
- EAN9781610278027
- Date de parution10/05/2016
- Protection num.pas de protection
- Infos supplémentairesepub
- ÉditeurMark Childress
Résumé
The May 2016 issue, Number 7, features these contents:* Article, "The Positive Law Model of the Fourth Amendment, " by William Baude and James Y. Stern* Essay, "Deference and Due Process, " by Adrian Vermeule* Book Review, "How to Explain Things with Force, " by Mark Greenberg* Note, "Free Speech Doctrine After Reed v. Town of Gilbert"Furthermore, student commentary analyzes Recent Cases on the Affordable Care Act and the origination clause; statutory interpretation and the Video Privacy Protection Act; and commercial speech doctrine and the FDA's power to prosecute nonmisleading statements after modifying text.
Other commentary examines South Carolina's legislative effort to to disqualify companies who support BDS from receiving state contracts; and the NLRB's adjudicative ruling to classify canvassers as employees, not independent contractors. Finally, the issue includes several brief comments on Recent Publications. The Harvard Law Review is offered in a quality digital edition, featuring active Contents, linked footnotes, active URLs, legible tables, and proper ebook and Bluebook formatting.
The Review is a student-run organization whose primary purpose is to publish a journal of legal scholarship. It comes out monthly from November through June and has roughly 2500 pages per volume. Student editors make all editorial and organizational decisions. This is the seventh issue of academic year 2015-2016.
Other commentary examines South Carolina's legislative effort to to disqualify companies who support BDS from receiving state contracts; and the NLRB's adjudicative ruling to classify canvassers as employees, not independent contractors. Finally, the issue includes several brief comments on Recent Publications. The Harvard Law Review is offered in a quality digital edition, featuring active Contents, linked footnotes, active URLs, legible tables, and proper ebook and Bluebook formatting.
The Review is a student-run organization whose primary purpose is to publish a journal of legal scholarship. It comes out monthly from November through June and has roughly 2500 pages per volume. Student editors make all editorial and organizational decisions. This is the seventh issue of academic year 2015-2016.






















