Dimiter Daphinoff ist emeritierter Professor für Englische Literatur an der Universität Freiburg.
Franziska Metzger ist Professorin für Geschichte an der Pädagogischen Hochschule Luzern.
Paul Oberholzer lehrt mittelalterliche Geschichte an der Fakultät für Kirchengeschichte an der Päpstlichen Universität Gregoriana in Rom.
Jacques Picard ist Professor emeritus für Jüdische Geschichte und Kultur in der Moderne an der Universität Basel und Fellow der Universität Haifa - Emeritus for Modern Jewish History and Culture at the University of Basel, Switzerland, and Fellow of the University of Haifa, Israel.
Franziska Metzger ist Professorin für Geschichte an der Pädagogischen Hochschule Luzern.
Dimiter Daphinoff ist emeritierter Professor für Englische Literatur an der Universität Freiburg.
Appropriation as Practice of Memory. Inventions, Uses, and Transformations of Religious Memory
Par : , , , ,Formats :
Disponible dans votre compte client Decitre ou Furet du Nord dès validation de votre commande. Le format PDF est :
- Compatible avec une lecture sur My Vivlio (smartphone, tablette, ordinateur)
- Compatible avec une lecture sur liseuses Vivlio
- Pour les liseuses autres que Vivlio, vous devez utiliser le logiciel Adobe Digital Edition. Non compatible avec la lecture sur les liseuses Kindle, Remarkable et Sony
, qui est-ce ?Notre partenaire de plateforme de lecture numérique où vous retrouverez l'ensemble de vos ebooks gratuitement
Pour en savoir plus sur nos ebooks, consultez notre aide en ligne ici
- Nombre de pages382
- FormatPDF
- ISBN978-3-412-53143-0
- EAN9783412531430
- Date de parution18/11/2024
- Protection num.pas de protection
- Taille25 Mo
- Infos supplémentairespdf
- ÉditeurBöhlau
Résumé
This volume explores how narratives and iconographic codes in literature, art, music, material culture and social, political, and economic discourses were appropriated and thereby - sometimes radically - transformed by religious agents, and how religious narrations, discourses and iconographic practices were reimagined and used (up to radical deconstruction) in non-religious contexts as well as in different or transformed religious contexts.
Religious appropriation is thereby conceived as practice of memory, drawing on reused - and creating transformed - narrative and visual spaces of imagination. The dimension of memory will contribute to a more differentiated typology of practices of appropriation, their forms, functions and functionalisation. Agency and power relations will be important factors in the individual contributions of this trans-disciplinary volume that links approaches from memory studies, religious history, literary studies, and art history.
Religious appropriation is thereby conceived as practice of memory, drawing on reused - and creating transformed - narrative and visual spaces of imagination. The dimension of memory will contribute to a more differentiated typology of practices of appropriation, their forms, functions and functionalisation. Agency and power relations will be important factors in the individual contributions of this trans-disciplinary volume that links approaches from memory studies, religious history, literary studies, and art history.




